Clinical analysis of liver dysfunction in pregnant patients with mild SARS CoV-2 infection

Objective: The current study aimed to describe the clinical characteristics of mild SARS-CoV-2 infected pregnant women with abnormal liver function (ALF), explore the association between ALF with maternal and fetal outcomes. Method(s): This retrospective analysis included 87 pregnant patients with mild SARS-CoV-2 infection admitted and treated from December 1, 2022, to 31, 2022 in the department of Obestircs at Beijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital. We evaluated patients for demographic and clinical features, laboratory parameters and pregnancy complications. Result(s): 27 Patients in this cohort had clinical presentations of ALF. Compared with the control group, the peripheral blood platelet (PLT), D-dimer quantitative determination (D-Dimer), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), total protein (TP), albumin (ALB), indirect bilirubin (DBIL), gamma- glutamyltranspeptidase (GGT) and total bile acid (TBA) showed significantly differences (p<0.05). 12 cases (44.44%) complicated with pregnancy induced hypertension (PIH), 14 cases (51.85%) complicated with intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy (ICP), 2 cases (7.4%) complicated with acute fatty liver during pregnancy (AFLP) and 5 cases (14.81%) complicated with postpartum hemorrhage in patients with abnormal LFT were significantly higher than those in the control group (p<0.05). Compared with the control group, the incidence of premature delivery (22.22%) and fetal distress (37.04%) in the experiment group were significantly higher (p<0.05), and the incidence of neonatal asphyxia was not significantly different (p>0.05). Conclusion(s): Pregnant women are generally susceptible to mild SARS-CoV-2 and may induce ALF. ALF is associated with increased risk of mother and infant. The maternal and infant outcomes of those who terminated pregnancy in time are acceptable. Therefore, pregnant women with COVID-19 who received antiviral treatment should be closely monitored for evaluating liver function and relevant indicators. The long-term outcomes in the future are worth to further study.Copyright © 2023

Caesarean section in critically unwell peri-partum patients with COVID-19: A tertiary centre's experience

Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic has required clinical teams to function with an unprecedented amount of uncertainty, balancing complex risks and benefits in a highly fluid environment. This is especially the case when considering the delivery of a pregnant woman critically unwell with COVID-19. This is one maternal critical care team's reflections on establishing best practice and a shared mental model when undertaking a Caesarean section in critically unwell patients with COVID-19. Objective(s): We describe our experience of balancing the risks and streamlining the process of this high-risk intervention. Method(s): We used our standard clinical governance forums across four specialties (Obstetrics, Intensive care, Anaesthetics and Neonatology) to identify key challenges and learning points. We developed a working group to combine our learning and develop a shared mental model across the involved teams. Result(s): 1. The decision to deliver must be multidisciplinary involving Obstetrics, Intensive care, Anaesthetics, Neonatology and the patient according to their capacity to participate. The existing structure of twice daily ITU ward rounds could be leveraged as a 'pause' moment to consider the need for imminent delivery and review the risk-benefit balance of continued enhanced pharmacological thromboprophylaxis. 2. We identified a range of scenarios that our teams might be exposed to: 3. Perimortem Caesarean section 4. Critically unwell - unsafe to move to theatre 5. Critically unwell - safe to move to theatre 6. Recreating an obstetric theatre in the ICU Advantages Avoids moving a critically unstable patient, although our experience is increasing moving patients for ECMO. Some forms of maximal non-invasive therapy such as High Flow Nasal Oxygen may require interruption to move to theatre with resultant risk of harm or be difficult to continue in transport mode through a bulky ICU ventilator e.g. CPAP Disadvantages Significant logistics and coordination burden: multiple items of specialist equipment needing to be brought to the ICU. Human factors burden: performing a caesarean section in an unfamiliar environment is a significant increase in cognitive load for participating teams. Environmental factors: ICU side rooms may offer limited space vs the need to control the space if performed on an open unit. Delivering a Neonate into a COVID bubble. Conclusion(s): Developing a shared mental model across the key teams involved in delivering an emergency caesarean section in this cohort of critically unwell patients has enabled our group to own a common understanding of the key decisions and risks involved. We recommend a patient centred MDT decision making model, with a structure for regular reassessment by senior members of the teams involved. In most circumstances the human factors and logistical burden of recreating an operating theatre in the ICU outweighs the risk of transport to theatre. Pre-defined checklists and action cards mitigate the cognitive and logistical burden when multiple teams do perform an operative delivery in ICU. Action cards highlight key aspects of routine obstetric care to be replicated in the ICU environment.

Anaesthetic pre-assessment of obese patients in obstetrics: challenges in COVID recovery

Introduction: One in five pregnant women in the UKis obese. Obesity is associated with increased risk of both maternal and foetal adverse outcomes. RCOG guidelines [1] recommend that all women with a booking BMI over 40 kg/m2 should be reviewed antenatally by a senior obstetric anaesthetist to guide risk assessment, medical optimisation and shared decision-making. The 2021 MBRRACE report [2] recommends that all women should be reweighed in the third trimester for accurate VTE risk scoring and prophylactic LMWH dosing. In our institution, reconfiguration of hospital areas as part of the COVID-19 response led to loss of designated clinic space for our obstetric anaesthetic clinic. As a result, our practice since has been to initially offer a telephone consultation followed by a face-to-face review if needed. Finding space for the latter has often been a significant logistical challenge. Our project sought to assess whether our practice continued to meet national standards in the wake of these changes. Method(s): Following audit approval, we retrospectively reviewed all women with a BMI >40 kg/m2 undergoing caesarean section (CS) over a six-month period (1/4/22 to 31/9/22). Result(s): 20 women met inclusion criteria (Category 1-3 CS - 12 women;Category 4 CS - 8 women). 100% of patients had booking height, weight and BMI recorded. 20% (4/20) of patients were reweighed in the 3rd trimester. Only 55% (11/20) of patients had been referred to and reviewed in the antenatal obstetric anaesthetic clinic (Figure). Of the 11 patients referred, 6 were referred later than 30 weeks. Of the 9 patients not referred, 8 had a BMI between 40 and 45 kg/m2. By contrast, 87% (6/7) of patients with BMI over 45 kg/m2 were referred and seen. Discussion(s): Our audit showed that we are not meeting national standards. Possible reasons identified were lack of awareness of the RCOG standards and referral criteria (especially for women with a BMI of 40 to 45 kg/m2) and logistical issues in undertaking face-to-face reviews without designated clinic space. Presentation of our results at the joint anaesthetic, obstetric and midwifery governance meeting has helped identify space in the antenatal clinic for face-to-face reviews, to start from March 2023 and to raise awareness of the national standards to ensure referral of all women with a BMI over 40 kg/m2. A reaudit is planned in 6 months. [Figure presented]Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd

COVID-19 Vaccine: Knowledge and Acceptance among Obstetric Population in Garhwal Region of Uttarakhand

Background: Coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) poses expectant mothers to a higher risk of serious complications and mortality. Following a risk-benefit review, a number of governmental and professional bodies from across the globe recently approved the COVID-19 vaccination during pregnancy. Aim(s): This study aimed to investigate knowledge, actual acceptance, and concerns about the COVID-19 vaccine among the obstetric population. Material(s) and Method(s): Participants were selected from among the expecting women who came for antenatal checkup during the study period (October 1, 2021-November 30, 2021). About 150 pregnant women who met the inclusion criteria and consented were recruited into the study. Data related to socio-demographic and clinical characteristics as well as knowledge, actual acceptance, and concerns about COVID-19 vaccine were collected through in-person interviews using a prestructured questionnaire. The SPSS version 23 was used to analyze data. The association between the attitude (acceptance and hesitance) of participants toward the COVID-19 vaccine and their sociodemographic and clinical profile was found by Fisher's exact test. Result(s): The actual acceptance of the COVID-19 vaccine among expecting women was 52.0%. The primary motive for accepting COVID-19 immunization was to protect the fetus, followed by the protection of one's own health. A significant association was found between COVID-19 vaccine acceptance and the level of education, socio-economic status, and presence of comorbidities. The leading causes for vaccine reluctance were concerns about the efficacy and safety of the vaccines and lack of awareness about their usage during pregnancy. Conclusion(s): Multifaceted activities are required to promote the effectiveness and safety profile of the COVID-19 vaccine as well as disseminate knowledge about its usage during pregnancy. Clinical significance: Unlike numerous other studies that have investigated the accepting attitude only, the present one has investigated the actual COVID-19 vaccine uptake among the obstetric population.Copyright © The Author(s).

Analysis of Maternal Critical Care at the Mid Yorkshire Hospitals NHS Trust

Introduction: Perinatal admissions to Critical Care are increasing due to rising maternal age, obesity, and comorbid disease.1 The MBRRACE Report 2021 stated that of 191 maternal deaths in 2017-2019, only 17% had good care.2 Since the COVID-19 pandemic, there was a subjective increase in perinatal admissions to Mid Yorkshire Hospitals Critical Care. Objective(s): To investigate whether MYH Critical Care maternal admissions have increased, if there has been a change in admission trends and to evaluate the care of critically ill pregnant and postpartum women compared to FICM standards.3 Methods: Retrospective audit of notes of all pregnant and up to 6 weeks postpartum women admitted to critical care between 24/02/2019 and 05/09/2021. Data collected included gestation, duration of admission, organ support, days reviewed by obstetrics and mortality outcomes. Result(s): * There was 1 maternal death and 3 fetal deaths during the study period * 50% of the admissions were antenatal and 50% were postnatal * During the COVID-19 pandemic we have seen a 47% increased rate of admissions from 1 per 29 critical care bed days to 1 per 19 critical care bed days * 50% of patients were supported with ventilation and CPAP during admission, 13% with CPAP only. Prior to the COVID pandemic, no maternal admission required CPAP on our Critical Care unit during the data collection period * 63% of patients were reviewed by obstetrics at least one during their admission, but obstetric review was documented on only 37 of 112 patient days * There is no critical care SOP for perimortem Caesarean section * There is no specialist neonatal resuscitation equipment available on ICU * There is no named ICM consultant responsible for Maternal Critical Care * There is no SOP for support of maternal contact with baby * There is no critical care/obstetric services MDT follow-up Conclusion(s): This study shows that Critical Care admissions have increased, and that care does not follow all the FICM recommendations. Considering this, the following recommendations have been made: * Introduce an SOP and simulation training for peri-mortem section * Introduce neonatal resuscitation equipment box * Nomination of a named ICM Consultant lead for Maternal Critical Care to ensure quality of care and act as liaison * Train critical care staff in supporting contact between a mother and baby, with support from midwifery services * Introduction of Obstetric and Critical Care MDT follow-up.

In-Person Versus Virtual Instruction and Simulation for Unplanned Out-of-Hospital Births

INTRODUCTION: Unplanned out-of-hospital births are uncommon and associated with serious complications. Most emergency medical services (EMS) personnel receive little or no instruction on emergent vaginal delivery. Our in-person (IP) lecture and simulation training on emergent vaginal delivery for EMS personnel previously demonstrated improvement in knowledge and confidence. With COVID-19 we adapted the same curriculum into a virtual training session (VTS). In-person simulation increases confidence and knowledge, but less is known about virtual simulation training. The purpose of this study was to assess EMS personnel's knowledge and confidence after IP versus VTS in emergent vaginal delivery. METHODS: The IP and VTS participants received the same lecture on emergent delivery either in-person or virtually. The IP group received in-person simulation training using a birth simulator. The VTS group received simulation training via virtual demonstration on the same model. Participants completed pretraining and posttraining surveys to assess knowledge and confidence. Responses were analyzed and compared using Student's t test. RESULTS: Ninety-eight participants (59 IP, 39 VTS) participated with 100% survey completion. Pretraining knowledge scores were similar (IP 45% versus VTS 37%, P =.22). Although both groups showed improvement, the IP group had significantly higher posttraining knowledge scores (IP 99% versus VTS 75%, P <.01). More IP participants reported confidence in performing emergent delivery after training (IP 100% versus VTS 51%, P <.01). CONCLUSION: Live in-person instruction and simulation training of emergent vaginal delivery among EMS personnel results in higher knowledge scores and confidence when compared to virtual instruction and simulation training. Further evaluation is needed to determine generalizability to other learner groups. [ FROM AUTHOR] Copyright of Obstetrics & Gynecology is the property of Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full . (Copyright applies to all s.)

COVID-19 and its consequences on the physical, psychological and social health of obstetricians

Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic has had effects on the health of health workers, including obstetricians, but the consequences in this occupational group are unknown. Objective: Determine the consequences of COVID-19 on the physical, psychological and social health of obstetricians in Peru. Methods: Observational, descriptive, cross-sectional study, carried out on 511 attending obstetricians, in the first line of care. An online questionnaire, previously validated and reliable, was applied to measure the variables: general characteristics and exposure to COVID-19, physical health, psychological health, and social health. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Results: 468 (91.6%) obstetricians are women, 287 (56.2%) aged 40-59 years, 213 (41.7%) married, 292 (57.1%) working at the first level of care;216 (42.3%) were infected with COVID-19, 165 (32.3%) had headache, 127 (24.9%) sore throat and 121 (23.7%) fatigue;167 (77.3%) required outpatient treatment and 3 (1.3%) intensive care. Obesity reported by 102 (20.0%) obstetricians was the main comorbidity, followed by hypertension with 38 (7.4%) and diabetes with 14 (2.7%);263 (51.5%) reported depressive symptoms and 464 (90.8%) stress;238 (46.6%) felt discrimination and 118 (23.1%) carried the workload of the home alone. Conclusions: The physical, psychological and social health of obstetricians is affected by the pandemic;generates disorders of overweight/obesity, depression, stress;as well as discrimination and work overload at home. © 2023, Editorial Ciencias Medicas. All rights reserved.

SARS-CoV-2 in Pregnancy, Birth and Puerperium. Guideline of the DGGG and DGPM (S2k-Level, AWMF Registry Number 015/092, March 2022)

Objective This S2k guideline of the German Society for Gynecology and Obstetrics (DGGG) and the German Society of Perinatal Medicine (DGPM) contains consensus-based recommendations for the care and treatment of pregnant women, parturient women, women who have recently given birth, and breastfeeding women with SARS-CoV-2 infection and their newborn infants. The aim of the guideline is to provide recommendations for action in the time of the COVID-19 pandemic for professionals caring for the above-listed groups of people. Methods The PICO format was used to develop specific questions. A systematic targeted search of the literature was carried out using PubMed, and previously formulated statements and recommendations issued by the DGGG and the DGPM were used to summarize the evidence. This guideline also drew on research data from the CRONOS registry. As the data basis was insufficient for a purely evidence-based guideline, the guideline was compiled using an S2k-level consensus-based process. After summarizing and presenting the available data, the guideline authors drafted recommendations in response to the formulated PICO questions, which were then discussed and voted on. Recommendations Recommendations on hygiene measures, prevention measures and care during pregnancy, delivery, the puerperium and while breastfeeding were prepared. They also included aspects relating to the monitoring of mother and child during and after infection with COVID-19, indications for thrombosis prophylaxis, caring for women with COVID-19 while they are giving birth, the presence of birth companions, postnatal care, and testing and monitoring the neonate during rooming-in or on the pediatric ward.Copyright © 2023. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Enoxaparin Sodium Biosimilar in the Prophylactic Treatment of Veinous Thromboembolism and Thromboembolic Disease: Prophyvar Study

Objectives: Varenox is the first locally manufactured and approved biosimilar in Algeria. It is an enoxaparin sodium (ES) with established good analytical characterization and manufacturing quality control. The aim of the PROPHYVAR study was to generate real-life data in routine practices and to assess the safety and tolerability in the prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism (VTE). Method(s): This is an observational, prospective, multicenter study, conducted between April 2021 and May 2022. The primary safety outcome was the incidence of Adverse Events (AEs) related to the study drug. A sample size of 500 patients was calculated to estimate the proportion of patients with AEs. Assuming that approximately 10% will be lost to follow-up or not evaluable, 550 patients were needed to describe the impact of Varenox use. Result(s): The study was conducted in 25 different sites in Algeria, in 4 therapeutic areas: ICU, orthopedic surgery, obstetrics and nephrology;550 patients were included and received at least one injection of Varenox. The mean age was 47 years, women in majority (62.5%). The patients were overweight or obese (53%), with a history of arterial hypertension (25%), diabetes (7.5%) and renal failure (6.4%). Reasons for hospitalization were mainly fracture (15.5%), pregnancy (8.3%), COVID-19 (7%) or cancer (7%). The majority of patients were treated at prophylactic dose of 0.4ml (80%) or 0.6ml (10%). The median duration of follow-up was 24 days. A total of 38 patients experienced at least one AE (6.9%, CI95=[4.9%;9.4%]). Related AEs were reported in 10 patients (1.8%), mainly in nephrology (N=7 arterio-venous fistula). VTE events were reported in 6 patients (1.1%, CI95=[0.2%;2%]). Conclusion(s): This study suggests that Varenox is safe in the prophylaxis of VTE. To our knowledge this is the first large study describing the use of ES in current medical practice in Algeria.Copyright © 2023

Case study from Kosovo - repetitive COVID-19 infection and pregnancy

A 25-year-old woman, gravida 2, with no medical history of cardiovascular nor other chronic diseases, came to the gynaecologist and described symptoms of a flu-like disease, including very high fever. The gyneacologist prescribed her antibiotics and paracetamol to calm down the fever. At 37 week of gestation she was admitted to the provincial COVID-19 treatment center for isolation and health care in University Clinical Center of Kosovo in Gynecology/Obstetrics department. All bacteriological tests, including hemocultures and cultures of urines were negative. She received antipyretics (acetaminophen), antispasmodics trimethylphloroglucinol and antibiotics (oral azithromycin for 5 days and intravenous ceftriaxone). Despite this treatments, fever and uterine contractions persisted therefor the commission of doctors decided to deliver the baby via ceserean section. The peritoneal cavity and uterus were found to be very inflamed. Fetal appendages as well as the bladder were strewn with eruptive, vesicular lesions bleeding on contact. After few hours after the delivery her temperature (36.5 degreeC) and blood pressure (120/60 mmHg) were normal. The baby was healthy and tested negative on the COVD-19 tests performed. The patients after 2 weeks of treatment and a negative COVID-19 result she was released to go home and was counselled to eat healthy and prescribed multivitamins for her immune system and regular follow ups with the gynecologist. In a period of 8 months the patient became pregnant again and got infected with the COVID-19 again at 25 weeks pregnant. This time the symptoms were not severe and she was followed up at home. The delivery was planned with cesarean section and the baby was in healthy conditions. The patient got vaccinated with Astra Zeneca COVID-19 vaccine after the delivery. Because of their changed physiology, susceptibility to infections, and weakened mechanical and immunological processes, pregnant women are a particularly vulnerable group in any infectious disease outbreak. The requirement to protect the fetus adds to the difficulty of controlling their health. Keywords: COVID-19, pregnant women, cesarean section, Kosovo, astra-zeneca vaccineCopyright © 2023

Advance Care Planning in Obstetrics: Effectiveness of a Didactic Intervention on Provider Comfort and Knowledge

INTRODUCTION: Within obstetrics care, it can be difficult to discuss death and advances directives (AD). Recent maternal illnesses and deaths secondary to COVID-19 highlight the importance of these conversations. There is little available research regarding AD in obstetrics, especially within medical education. This study aimed to establish a baseline of obstetric provider comfort and knowledge with this material, provide education, and then reassess comfort and knowledge. METHODS: Institutional review board committee approval was waived for this study. A pre-intervention survey, including a unique identifier to allow for pairing of pre/post-surveys, was emailed to residents of a large university obstetrics and gynecology department with questions assessing comfort and knowledge of AD. The intervention was a 45-minute lecture covering definitions and local state laws relating to AD. A postsurvey, with identical questions to the presurvey, was sent 2 weeks after the intervention. Only paired responses were analyzed, using paired t test. RESULTS: Twenty-three residents (96% of program) participated in the presurvey;17 (71%) participated in the postsurvey. All were matched to presurvey responses and analyzed. In the presurvey, 41% of respondents were usually or always comfortable identifying surrogate decision makers, which increased to 82% in the postsurvey, a 41% difference (P =.01). With regards to the knowledge-based questions, the mean correct response was 56% in the presurvey and 87% in the postsurvey, a 31% difference (P <.001). CONCLUSION: A simple didactic intervention showed improvement in comfort and knowledge surrounding topics of AD for ob-gyn residents. Additional research relating to patient awareness of AD during pregnancy could be explored. [ FROM AUTHOR] Copyright of Obstetrics & Gynecology is the property of Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full . (Copyright applies to all s.)

Joyce Lilian Dunlop

Joyce went to Trinity College Dublin to study medicine in 1954, where she enjoyed the Dublin University Biological Society and where she met the love of her life, Jim, a Scotsman, at the Dublin sailing school. After house jobs, Joyce spent some time in Northern Ireland, training in anaesthetics for obstetrics and gynaecology. Before coronavirus took hold, she was looking forward to a family holiday in Croatia in the summer with her three children, their spouses, and all her grandchildren, before her sudden death.

Comparison of Obstetric Outcomes in First and Second COVID-19 Waves: Analysis from a COVID-19-dedicated Tertiary Care Hospital

Introduction: The physiological changes in the respiratory and cardiovascular systems in the immunosuppressed state of pregnancy may exacerbate clinical features and deteriorate outcomes due to COVID-19 infection. We aimed to compare the maternal and neonatal adverse effects in the first and second COVID-19 waves. Methodology: This study was a prospective cohort study conducted in a tertiary care COVID-19-dedicated hospital. In total, 104 (group A) and 96 (group B) COVID-19-positive pregnant women admitted during the first and second waves, respectively, were included in the study. Data on baseline variables, associated comorbidities, clinical presentations, management strategies, and neonatal and maternal outcomes were collected and compared using parametric and nonparametric tests and analyzed. Result(s): Around 2.08% in group A and 6.72% in group B of COVID-19-infected pregnant women, respectively, had moderate-to-severe disease and required intensive care unit stay. Almost 1.04% in group A and 3.84% in group B had maternal mortality, 13.4% and 19.8% babies of groups A and B required admission in neonatal intensive care units, and 8.6% and 7.3% of newborns in groups A and B had COVID-19-positive reports by reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) at birth, respectively. Of them, 2.1% newborns in group B had RT-PCR positive on day 7 of life and beyond, whereas none had positive RT-PCR reports on 7 days and beyond in group A. Conclusion(s): Dreadful maternal outcomes like requirement of ICU and mechanical ventilator and persistence of neonatal infections were higher during the second wave.Copyright © The Author(s). 2023.

Side Effects of COVID-19 Vaccine in Pregnant Women: A Bibliometric Study

Introduction: Side effects related to COVID-19 vaccination are short-lived and disappear within a few days and can affect both pregnant and nonpregnant women. Aim(s): To evaluate the bibliometric profile of the worldwide scientific production on the side effects of COVID-19 vaccine in pregnant women, in Scopus. Material(s) and Method(s): A retrospective, cross-sectional, bibliometric study that analyzed metadata published in scientific journals indexed in Scopus during 2019 and 2021. The search and download of the papers were performed on May 13, 2022, and the SciVal program was used for the measurement of the bibliometric indicators. Result(s): The Lancet Infectious Diseases and International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics had the highest impact with 24.8 and 14.3 citations per publication, respectively. The institutions with the highest number of papers were Harvard University and National Institutes of Health, with 13 papers, respectively. Goldfarb Ilona Telefus, Kampmann Beate, and Khalil Asma were the authors with the highest number of papers, with 3 each. Only one publication on the side effects of COVID-19 vaccine in pregnant women was identified in 2019, whereas the highest scientific output was identified in 2021, with 127, of which 67 were from Q1. Conclusion(s): In Scopus, there is an increase in the production of papers on the side effects of the vaccine against COVID-19 in pregnant women, with the United States being the country with the most institutions with the highest scientific production. However, over the years, the quartile of the journals where these studies were published decreased.Copyright © The Author(s).

Seven days in medicine: 6-12 May 2020

In a report summarising the feedback it had received,2 the charity noted a litany of "horrendous” safety concerns, as workers were concerned about a lack of personal protective equipment and about their mental health. NICE: assess covid patients for kidney injury Patients with suspected or confirmed covid-19 should be assessed for acute kidney injury (AKI) on hospital admission or transfer, said the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). In a new guideline aimed at healthcare professionals who are not kidney specialists, the institute said that patients with suspected or confirmed covid-19 should be monitored for AKI throughout their stay in hospital and managed appropriately if it develops.

Profile of cesarean section during COVID-19 using Robson ten group classification system in a tertiary teaching hospital, Nepal: a cross-sectional study.

Caesarean section is performed when there are pregnancy related complications and vaginal delivery cannot be tried or fails. The effect of pandemic lockdown on the availability as well as accessibility of health services is a global concern. The aim of this study was to find out the caesarean section rate and its indication at a tertiary care hospital during COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: A hospital-based cross-sectional study was conducted among women admitted for delivery in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology of a tertiary teaching hospital during the second wave of COVID-19 (1 May 2021-30 July 2021). Convenience sampling technique was applied and 1350 women were categorized into groups using Robson ten group classification system. Group size, group caesarean rate, absolute and relative contribution of each group to overall caesarean rate were calculated. Results: Out of 1350 total deliveries during COVID-19, lower segment caesarean section was done in 446 (33.04%) (30.53-35.55 at 95% Confidence Interval). Major indication for caesarean section was previous caesarean in 185 (41.48%). Most women 202 (45.29%) were from the age group 24-30 years and gestational age between 37 and 42 weeks. Major contributor to the overall caesarean section rate was Robson group 5 (37%). Conclusions: This study showed higher prevalence of caesarean section delivery rate during COVID-19 pandemic than that compared with 2016 national statistics of Nepal. Despite of several challenges brought by the pandemic, pregnant women were still able to access the emergency obstetric care services in the Eastern part of Nepal. However, future studies should focus on exploring the situation in rural areas too.

Rise of public e-learning opportunities in the context of COVID-19 pandemic-induced curtailment of face-to-face courses, exemplified by epidural catheterization on YouTube.

BACKGROUND: In the context of the coronavirus pandemic, countless face-to-face events as well as medical trainings were cancelled or moved to online courses, which resulted in increased digitalization in many areas. In the context of medical education, videos provide tremendous benefit for visualizing skills before they are practised. METHODS: Based on a previous investigation of video material addressing epidural catheterization available on the YouTube platform, we aimed to investigate new content produced in the context of the pandemic. Thus, a video search was conducted in May 2022. RESULTS: We identified twelve new videos since the pandemic with a significant improvement in the new content in terms of procedural items (p = 0.03) compared to the prepandemic video content. Video content released in the course of the COVID-19 pandemic was more often created by private content creators and were significantly shorter in total runtime than those from university and medical societies (p = 0.04). CONCLUSION: The profound changes in the learning and teaching of health care education in relation to the pandemic are largely unclear. We reveal improved procedural quality of predominantly privately uploaded content despite a shortened runtime compared to the prepandemic period. This might indicate that technical and financial hurdles to producing instructional videos by discipline experts have decreased. In addition to the teaching difficulties caused by the pandemic, this change is likely to be due to validated manuals on how to create such content. The awareness that medical education needs to be improved has grown, so platforms offer specialized sublevels for high-quality medical videos.

Association between SARS-CoV-2 infection and newly diagnosed hypertension during pregnancy: prospective, population based cohort study.

Objective: To study the association between SARS-CoV-2 infection and newly diagnosed hypertension during pregnancy. Design: Prospective, population based cohort study. Setting: All singleton pregnancies after 22 completed gestational weeks registered in the Swedish Pregnancy Register and the Medical Birth Registry of Norway, from 1 March 2020 to 24 May 2022. Participants: 312 456 individuals available for analysis (201 770 in Sweden and 110 686 in Norway), with pregnancies that reached 42 completed gestational weeks by the end of follow-up in the pregnancy registries, excluding individuals with SARS-CoV-2 infection before pregnancy and those with a diagnosis of pre-existing hypertension or onset of hypertension before 20 gestational weeks. Main outcome measures: Newly diagnosed hypertension during pregnancy was defined as a composite outcome of a diagnosis of gestational hypertension, pre-eclampsia, HELLP (haemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, low platelets) syndrome, or eclampsia, from gestational week 20 to one week after delivery. The association between SARS-CoV-2 infection and hypertension during pregnancy was investigated with a stratified Cox proportional hazard model, adjusting for maternal age, body mass index, parity, smoking, region of birth, education, income, coexisting medical conditions, previous hypertension during pregnancy, number of healthcare visits during the past year, and vaccination against SARS-CoV-2. Pre-eclampsia was also analysed as a separate outcome. Results: Of 312 456 individuals available for analysis, 8% (n=24 566) had SARS-CoV-2 infection any time during pregnancy, 6% (n=18 051) had a diagnosis of hypertension during pregnancy, and 3% (9899) had pre-eclampsia. SARS-CoV-2 infection during pregnancy was not associated with an increased risk of hypertension during pregnancy (adjusted hazard ratio 0.99, 95% confidence interval 0.93 to 1.04) or pre-eclampsia (0.98, 0.87 to 1.10). The results were similar for SARS-CoV-2 infection in all gestational trimesters and in different time periods that corresponded to dominance of different variants of the SARS-CoV-2 virus. Conclusions: This population based study did not find any evidence of an association between SARS-CoV-2 infection during pregnancy and an increased risk of hypertension during pregnancy or pre-eclampsia.

Assessment of Pregnancy-Related Telehealth Interventions in the United States: A 10-Year Scoping Review.

Introduction: Telehealth use in obstetrics has been demonstrated to improve efficiency, access to care, and pregnancy outcomes. Despite reported successful implementation of these programs, information regarding the program variations and its impact on health care costs and outcomes are scarce. Methods: This is a scoping review of pregnancy-related telehealth studies to understand the current landscape of pregnancy-related telehealth interventions as well as to subset those that are used in high-risk pregnancies. We used the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses framework to guide this review. Results: A total of 70 articles were included in this scoping review. Of those, 53 (75.7%) studies included a pregnant population and 17 (24.3%) studies focused on a rural and/or urban population. Most studies (n = 56; 80%) included some form of synchronous interaction between provider and participant. Patient outcomes included maternal/infant health outcomes (n = 41; 44.1%), patient satisfaction (n = 9; 9.7%), and attendance/compliance (n = 5; 5.4%). Provider-level outcomes included knowledge change (n = 11; 11.8%) and self-efficacy (n = 3; 3.2%). Other outcomes included assessment of costs and patient/provider feasibility and acceptability of the intervention. Overall, there has been a growing trend in articles published on pregnancy-related telehealth studies since 2011, with 2018 having the most publications in a single year. Conclusion: This review suggests a steadily growing body of literature on pregnancy-related telehealth interventions; however, more research is needed to better understand outcomes of telehealth for pregnancy-related care, especially related to patient satisfaction, health disparities, and cost-benefit.